A Family Ring

My grandparents were married around 1921, and the ring my grandfather had made for my grandmother was a beautiful Trinity ring of three intertwined circles, one of old gold (signifying love), one yellow gold (friendship), and one white gold (loyalty).   I well remember my grandmother wearing it when I was a child, and after she died in 1956, my mother put it on and said she would never take it off.   She often said that I would wear it one day, and I always thought, yuck, an old dead lady ring, no way!  Well, she never did take it off, and after she died at eighty-eight, the funeral director retrieved it and gave it to me in an envelope.  I briefly felt that old distaste, put it in my purse and flew home. Then, a few days later, I polished it nicely, and slipped it on my hand to see how it would look and feel.   To my surprise, it was not only a perfect fit, but it looked beautiful, and somehow felt right.  I had put it over my very slim wedding ring, and showed it to Peter, saying that I thought I would wear it. He's the least sentimental of men, but he looked unhappy, and asked anxiously, "But - that doesn't mean you're going to take off mine?" I immediately said no, of course not! When I wore it (which wouldn't be every day) I'd wear it on my other hand!

My grandparents, Maurice and Naomi Finkelstein.

On shipboard, on the way to their honeymoon in Europe, 1921.  (She must have been wearing the ring!)  He became a law professor, and she was a teacher and president of Women's American O.R.T., working with Jewish refugees in the years after the war.

I realized then that whatever the ring had meant in the past - a symbol of my grandparents' devoted marriage (which showed me that such a thing was possible and therefore led directly to my own); or a symbol of my mother's loss and memory of her own mother - it had now taken on a new meaning.  The symbolism that the Trinity now assumed, was that it represented and joined the three women who had worn it, and would wear it:   My grandmother, my mother, and me.

The three who wore the ring, my grandmother, my mother, and me, 1956.

This picture was taken only weeks before my grandmother's death.  She was only 58, but suffered all her life from rheumatic heart disease she had as a child, now preventable with antibiotics.

I told my teenage cousin Joanna that she could wear the ring when she got married one day if she liked, but she made that teenage face of disgust and said, "It's too big for me," just as I once might have done. Never mind. It may be that she will grow into it.   As I did.

 

 My grandfather, as I remember him.

On Cape Cod, early 1950s.

A four-generation picture, around 1948. 

My great-grandmother Anna Koppelman, who emigrated from Lithuania in the 1880s, her daughter Naomi, her daughter Helen (Bunny) and me, Diana (Denny)

A Smooth Transition

A story told in letters.  To my cousin Alice, Wednesday:

Hi Alice, it looks like my mother is on the way out this weekend. She's unconscious with internal bleeding and zero blood pressure, so it won't be long. I spoke to her yesterday but apparently she's been asleep since we hung up the phone and David left.   So it's peaceful.   Paul and I will come to New York as soon as it's over, and we're organizing details now. If you were able to come down, I'd love to see you then, if that is possible.    xx Denny

Helen Finkelstein Reeve, "Bunny"
October 15, 1923 - January 12, 2012
At 20, in 1943

My mother in 2008, blind, at the Hebrew Home for the Aged

(photograph taken by my cousin Judy)

To my cousins Anne and David, early Thursday morning:

Dear Anne and David,

Perhaps you have heard by now that my mother has passed away. The doctor called me at 11 PM our time. It was peaceful.  Paul and I are flying out on Delta at 6 AM, and will arrive in Newark at 4:30 PM Thursday. We'll stay four nights at the Larchmont Hotel on 11th Street.

 
My cousin Anne Finkelstein reading her thoughts at the wake, while cousin Alice Chico listens

To the Piffle list, Friday:

Here I am in New York. Dark and rainy as the devil. Sleepless night spent packing and speedily getting an array of low carb food for Peter for while I'm gone (four nights). The cats cried with misery to see us go.  Then two planes, changing in Salt Lake.   Hate indirect flights, but what's the option? Direct LA-NY same day flights are $1000 round trip. Asked about bereavement rates, was told, "We can give you as a bereavement rate...$1000."   Hell with that, the one-stop flight is $500, still bad but better.   Luckily flights were expeditious and smooth, and Salt Lake's mountains and lake were a beautiful sight. Worked on the plane, finished reading and started writing up a manuscript.  I could have turned it back, given the emergency, but can't sleep on planes and didn't like to leave them in the lurch, as there really wasn't time by deadline to reassign the work.

At the wake:  David, Tom, Joanna, Anne

Paul and I landed in Newark, a mere $80 cab ride into the city but we were tired.  Ensconced at our beloved  b & b, the Larchmont, which gave us the fourth night free as it's out of season.   Then we headed directly to my cousin Anne's house, to meet with the Cut Rate Funeral Director. The Hebrew Home had given us a list of places that charged $5000 - $8000 for a funeral, and I was absolutely, fiercely determined not to pay anything in that range. My mother did pay some funeral expense when she went into the Home, but it seems nobody can find a trace of it or what it was for (we're going up there to look into that today, and to pick up her pictures and books). She has a seat in the family plot, so that's good.  I decided against having a service in a chapel in the city, which is what costs in the thousands; we'll do a brief graveside thing with my rabbi cousin presiding.  I would have skipped it but my mother would not have liked that, and I want to strike the exact right balance between being respectful of my mother's Judaism and true to my own atheism and determination to be economical (which she would have appreciated). When I was informed of the death I did say the Shema in accord with childhood training, which I thought was quite remarkable of me to remember.



Alice and me at the wake

Bottom line cost is $1200, but a plain coffin, necessary in Jewish burials, is another $1000 (though the funeral director said he could do it at $500 "for me." (I'll take it up with my rabbi cousin; the standard one included in the $1200 is plain wood but has a little metal trim. Am I seriously obligated to pay $500 real live dollars to get rid of the trim? Come on.)   Refused to pay various expenses like ritual washings and viewings and fancy hearses and Chief Mourner candles and other fal-lals which were thankfully optional. Limousine to the cemetery far out of the city is $350, but unavoidable. There are seven of us in the party (my two cousins Anne and David, their spouses Jim and Tom, Anne's 14-year-old daughter Joanna with her charming red metallic hair and boots, and me and Paul), and after all we can't be going on the subway. 


David, Tom and Anne

But the $2100 won't be all. Oh no, not by a long shot. Today we'll find out the rest. There is Opening the Grave, which may rack up another $1000 or more, and who knows what other surprises lurk in wait.   Hopefully we may find that some of it's covered by what my mother paid in advance. ($1500 I think.) The funeral will be on Sunday, but Saturday night a gathering of relatives will come to Anne's apartment in the city, and that will be the real deal, hopefully rather jolly and wake-like. 

Joanna at almost 15

After concluding the business with the Cut Rate Funeral Director (who was very nice, and said He'd Seen Everything, but had never heard of Jessica Mitford, who, of course, I was channeling), Paul and I went to Viselka's, the all-night Ukrainian place on the Lower East Side for veal goulash and apple strudel.   Paul then hit a gay bar and I returned to the hotel to finish my work.   That done, I now get a  week's Bereavement Leave which will be very welcome after all my efforts. Total cost, flight, hotel, funeral, will certainly not be under five grand. My mother will be rolling in her grave.

   Joanna and cat, Anne and Paul

To Peter, Friday night:

Paul and I were so tired after our trip we slept in till nearly noon today, and then didn't have much time to get up to the Hebrew Home. Luckily, around the corner from the Larchmont is a branch of Murray's Sturgeon Shop, so I got an onion bagel with nova and Paul a bialy with whitefish.   Took the train uptown to the Home. It looked beautiful on the Hudson, as we saw it for the last time. Things went expeditiously.  Saw a Housekeeping man who ushered us into a little Bereaved Room where we sat and ate our bagels and lox while he brought in the five bins of my mother's things.   She had a suitcase and carry bag so we could use them to take what we wanted.  Most of it was clothes, which we donated.   We just gathered up the books and pictures and put them in the carry bag.  Then stopped in the financial office, where we were told she had $162 in her account which would be sent to the administrator.  She had $3 in her wallet so that was our legacy and we'll toast her with a cappuccino. It seems possible that the $1500 she paid for burial she paid to the cemetery itself, so we may not owe them anything. Hope not.


My cousin Judy, with her grandson Haskell, daughter Leah, and Joanna

                                      One of Joanna's cats. 

It was around 5 when we left the home, toting the books and things, and we took the express bus down to 34th and Lex, and a cab partway to [Peter's] parents. It got stuck behind an oil truck so we walked from Lexington. Only had half an hour to see Rut and Vivian but it was nice and we told them all our adventures and showed them my new iPad. We'll go see them tomorrow for breakfast. Then we went to Anne's and enjoyed the evening with them, having Indian takeout food and enjoying Joanna and the cats. I painted my nails sparkly purple with her nail polish. Then we took the bags back to the Larchmont, and sallied out for a walk in the Village. Quite cold, and my knee was hurting, but the walk was nice and we went to Caffe Dante for lovely tea and sublime profiteroles. That place opened in 1915 and is the real thing. Then back to the room and internet. Tomorrow is the wake at Anne's - Alice is coming down from Syracuse and Judy is coming with her family, so it will be really nice.

                                             The High Line

                                       Paul on the High Line

                                     Paul and me on the High Line

                                  Bittersweet growing on the High Line

To the Dove Grey Books list, Friday:

Didn't bring anything to read - had to finish my work on the plane, after which I get a week's bereavement time off.   When I've had a moment, have just been doing email.  Lots of very kind messages, though I didn't have a normal relationship with my mother, and it's not the same sort of loss as most people have under the circumstances.   However it is certainly an epochal sort of feeling. One of my cousins wrote "may you have a smooth transition to the older generation," which made me go "ugh," but I guess it's true! Anyway I put on some of my teenage cousin Joanna's sparkly purple fingernail polish...

Fabulous exhibition at the Met:  "Infinite Jest"

To Peter, Saturday:

This morning Paul and I picked up more Murray's Sturgeon Shop bagels (don't worry, I will indeed bring Pindy and you sturgeon!) and went over to your parents' house to visit and have bagels-and-lox with them.  Afterwards, we felt the need for some fun. Went to the Metropolitan Opera Thrift Shop, where I found a lovely little candle [Fire King Peach Lustre glassware, circa 1950] for $3, exactly my mother's legacy, so I put a candle in it to burn at the wake and it will be her memorial candle.  Then we went to the Met where we vastly enjoyed a MOST fabulous exhibit, Infinite Jest, caricatures and grotesqueries from Leonardo to modern times, concentrating on Gilray and Rowlandson.   It was so good we actually bought the book, so you can enjoy it too:

http://www.metmuseum.org/en/exhibitions/listings/2011/infinite-jest--caricature-and-satire-from-leonardo-to-levine

Obviously not everyone would go to an exhibit on Infinite Jest the day of their mother's wake, but we thought it was pretty much a perfect stroke of ironic genius.  Afterwards there was just time to hurry back down the Larchmont and tidy up, then cab to Anne's. Well, I thought the wake would be good but it was way beyond expectations. No mean people there. Just nice warm sweet ones, all so kind and happy to be together and share memories and relationships. We old ones talked about the crazy ones that came before us and the young ones listened!   My cousin Judy, who was very kind and often visited my mother, was there with her two daughters Nonie and Leah  and one grandson, Haskell, all so warm and congenial.  My cousin Alice came down from Syracuse with her husband Michael and son Jason. There were also David, Tom, Anne, Jim, and Joanna, so a lovely group. There was complete honesty and no saccharinity in the room, as we discussed and wondered not what made my mother crazy (that's easy:  my grandmother) but why my grandmother, othewise a wonderful, sweet woman, acted like that, and the strange dynamics of the family.  How damaged my mother was, but that because of Ezra, David, Anne and the Hebrew Home, she was able to collect her mind and lived a final mellow ten years, giving everyone the chance to get to know what she could be - for her heroism under blindness, indigence, and adversity, could only be praised.   (I always tell how she read all of Trollope on tape in the first year of her blindness.)  David talked about how he went to see her not out of duty but because he enjoyed her company so much, which is exactly what Josh (Ezra's son, who will officiate at the burial tomorrow) said Ezra says. Anne talked about some good times she had with my mother, how bright she was, how she kept her mind, and gave her advice about Joanna.   I thanked them for taking care of her and making it possible for me to make friends and have a peaceful resolution with her; and ended by saying that what everyone said about her made me think I was not so unlucky to have her for a mother after all! 

Afterwards Paul and I finished up at Veselka's where he had a Ukrainian meatball hero and I had matzoh ball soup and a bacon and egg sandwich. Now to bed, the limousine comes for us at 9:30 to take us to the burial.  Paul is horrified that his little Tully is pining for him! Anne's cats are awesomely healthy and strong, all muscular like a pair of leopards; they could not be more different from our louche bohemian languishing cats.

Love, Denny

Me and Paul in Central Park

To the Piffle list, Monday

From Helen:  "It's interesting that most people don't take up the prepaid funeral option, which is really one of the best investment returns available.  My Dad, who was the epitome of organisation, organised and paid for his about 20 years before he died, paying about 30% of what the equivalent current cost was. Where else can you get that sort of return these days?  [It] was easy compared to the problems Denny is having, especially when you have various family members putting their ideas forward. We were able to fall back on "it's what Dad chose", end of argument."

 Oh, dear no, Helen. I'm thankful to report that it wasn't like that at all. This turned out to be the most absolutely beautiful funeral and weekend wake that anybody ever had, and it all ran like such smooth clockwork every single moment, that my mother could have paid and organized it decades ago and it couldn't have been better (and remember she was mentally ill and always struggling to survive, so pre-paying burial was probably the last thing on her mind at any given time. Actually, she did pre-pay $1500 in a burial account at the Hebrew Home, but it turns out she spent it over the years ;-)

The wake was an absolute delight, cousins laughing over memories and analyzing puzzling family influences, the warmest, kindest, happiest evening there ever could be. Then yesterday morning, the seven of us (me and Paul; cousin Anne her husband Jim and teenage daughter Joanna; and cousin David and his partner Tom), went via a smooth limo to the cemetery, where we met my cousin the rabbi's son Josh (also a rabbi). Oh, what a beautiful service he did give us! His father, Ezra, who couldn't come from Florida, sent lovely remarks about my mother's life, and Josh read those, did the Hebrew bits, and also spoke on his own about the life my mother led, as I'd discussed with him. She had essentially "gone sane" and had a most serene life in the Hebrew Home for the past decade, where David and Ezra each visited her weekly. It was all so perfect: it would have been exactly what my mother wanted, everyone there, everything done properly; it was solace to David and cheer to me, and we know that we got the most wonderful funeral and did not get rooked for it. Total charge: $2100, plus $1300 for opening the grave. Affordable; and priceless. What a feeling of rightness.

My mother's legacy - a vintage "Peach Lustre" candle bowl

I should mention that my aunts years ago arranged a place for my mother in the family plot, so that what would have been the really difficult business was indeed all taken care of.   She lies where she wanted to be, beside her favorite aunt, Rae, who was a second (and possibly better) mother to her.  So I guess it was pre-planned in a way.   But we are certainly not going to plan anything for ourselves.   Cheap cremation, over and out. I'd have done that for my mother too, only I wanted to respect her Judaism.   And I did.

 The limo took us back to the city and a lovely lunch, and then we went with Anne for a glorious walk on the High Line!  It is one of her favorite subjects as an artist, and she even has a show going on right now with her High Line paintings: 

http://www.sbdgallery.org/?portfolio=high-line-series-by-anne-finkelstein-on-march-26th-2011

                                    Anne Finkelstein's work

Before leaving on Monday afternoon, we met my friend Laurie and had a brisk, bracing, exhilarating walk in the Central Park Ramble.  She is a bird lady who goes twice a day to feed the red cardinals, snow or shine.  Starlings and sparrows flock to her in a thick cloud when they see (or hear?) her coming, and they alight on her hands to be fed.  Yesterday she counted 25 cardinals, and they are the most striking, brilliantly red sight in the bleak park.  Today we saw about a dozen, which seemed like a lot to us, for how many people ever see cardinals in Central Park?

                                       Paul and Laurie, Central Park

After that, we hurried to Chef Ho's Peking Duck to meet some of my dear Hunter friends, Marianne, Peter and Priscilla, for a bounteous and cheery Peking Duck lunch.  From there back to Laurie's to pick up our luggage, and then another $100 ride to Newark Airport. 

The first leg of the trip was fine, but then we got stuck with a four-hour delay in Minneapolis, where the plane was slow coming in from Denver because of de-icing.  Turbulent flight across the Rockies, and we got home after a 14-hour trip door to door, beyond exhausted.

Paul exasperated at airport delay

A timeless expression.  Netsuke.

(Sato Kagura Mask of Usofuki, courtesy of my friend Jennifer)

Dear Josh and dear Ezra,

I am writing to thank you jointly, because you were both there together, for my mother and for me, in the most wonderful and beautiful way possible. Josh, you took so much kind trouble to come and to give my mother a sensitive, understanding and absolutely perfect service. Ezra, you were there in spirit more than I have ever seen anybody be anywhere in spirit before! I do not have words in which to describe it or to thank you enough, but there was a sense of rightness and fitness, and tender respect for my mother, that seemed to shine down warmly over the whole occasion, and was epitomized when Josh spoke of her going to her rest.

For that is what she did. It was hardly even very sad, because she went so peacefully. She spoke to me on the phone last Tuesday as usual, and after David hung up the phone, she went immediately into a deep sleep, and never woke, but passed away without awareness the next day. We were told the news at 11 PM Wednesday Los Angeles time, and I remembered to say the Shema that my grandparents taught me should be said, and we were on a plane at 6 AM.

About my whole time in New York, there was a remarkable sense of peace and closure. The seven of us (me, Paul, Anne, David, Joanna, Jim and Tom) spent more time together than we ever have before, and I think I can speak for all of us when I say that we felt quite magically like a united family, a family of one mind (and it must be said, it felt pretty strange for me to now be the senior member!). We made a get-together at Anne's house, to which the Koppelman cousins, Judy (Celia's daughter), and Alice (Esther's daughter), their children and grandchildren came. It was a beautiful time, just as it should be, the older ones telling the younger ones about people and events of the past, and how they combined together to make the people who were here now. Everyone shared memories about my mother, and reflected on her difficult life and her serene end. Honestly, even though I keep denying religion for myself, I have to acknowledge that there was incontrovertably some divine plan about what happened to her in her last ten years. There can be no other explanation for how she was granted such grace and peace at the end of her life, which included, best of all, her reuniting with me. 

Ezra, you presided over it all, and helped bring her troubled life that very real peace, and if you ever did good in your life, that was a big one. It was remarkable too that you used the exact same words that David did, separately - that you visited my mother because you really enjoyed her. She really was a bright and brave spirit, very much like her father, and both of you helped that spirit to shine and live for awhile, just as it always should. That was why I could not wear the rended cloth that spoke of terrible grief, for to me her ending was truly a joyful one, in which she regained her own self, that for so long had been effaced and in darkness. I believe you both could see this, because that is the wonderful thing about family - you were there always. And for being there at this poignant time, I thank you both, Ezra and Josh, very much. 

Paul and I flew home to Los Angeles last night (long delays, 14 hours of travel, we got in exhausted at 3 AM!) but hope to get together with you again next time we are in New York, probably in October, when I'll be there for a talk.

Love, Denny

***********

A joyous reunion with Peter and the cats.  Little Tully quivered with joy at the sight of her beloved Paul; Marshy was so excited she ran wildly around the house, hitting the walls; and Pindar firmly stalked to my bed, planted herself in the center, and slept with me all night.

The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly in Current Austen Affairs

THE GOOD:  Dr. Cheryl Kinney Speaks at JASNA-Southwest Conference

Our local JASNA-SW Jane Austen's birthday celebration at the Los Angeles Athletic Club was one of our most wonderful meetings in years. Great turnout, speakers, authors, food, good cheer. For many, the outstanding feature was a talk by Dr. Cheryl Kinney. She is a Dallas gynecologist as well as Austen scholar, who was co-coordinator of the Ft. Worth JASNA AGM, and is one of the best speakers I've ever heard. She's got it all: intelligence, wit, sparkle, liveliness, allied to serious knowledge. Listening to her you are learning while being diverted, and are aware that this is a remarkable woman as well as speaker. I took a few notes on her intensely interesting speech, and here are a few of the odd and alarming facts I learned about her subject, which was "A Dangerous Indulgence: Women’s Health in Jane Austen’s Time."

In Jane Austen's day, men used to make medical decisions for women. The women of the household did all the nursing, however. Women were not allowed to be trained to use forceps, yet midwives often knew more than doctors: for instance, in a cookbook of the era, in the back pages dealing with health matters, a midwife wrote about how bed linen should be changed to stop the smell of infection. This means that 50 years before Lister, women knew about infection.

Barber poles were white, and with a red stripe it meant the barber was also a surgeon.

Christie's auctioned off an 1810 condom recently, for L20,000.

Abortion medications were sold everywhere, and could kill you.

Douching could kill you too, as it was done with dirty water and could cause infection.

Mr. Woodhouse's medical advice was all good - London really was unhealthy! Bad water, typhus, plague, abounded.  VD was everywhere, spread by upper class men.

The Royal Navy spread clap (gonorrhea) due to stowaway prostitutes.

A lovely young lady at sea
Who complained that it hurt her to pee
Said the brawny old mate
That accounts for the state
Of the cook and the captain and me.

Women in Jane Austen's day had menopause at age 44. Women were bled once a month for menopause troubles, by an apothecary. One treatment involved leaving leeches in the vagina for hours. With cervical cancer, women simply rotted inside.

Giles King-Lyford treated Jane Austen in her last two weeks, and she improved during that time. He was one of four sensible thinking physicians, and took excellent care of her, apparently until others were brought in. In Austen's detailed observations of her illness she described Addison's Disease 30 years before doctors did.

Dr. Matthew Bailey may have written something about her illness in his private diary - but it is in family hands and they won't release it.

To hear a podcast of a talk Dr. Kinney gave on "Jane Austen and the Body" at the Chicago Humanities Festival, click on this link. Her thesis is that “Austen-itis” as the recurrent use of sickness, health, frailty, and injury to develop Austen’s characters, drive her plots, and establish the comedic side of characters’ suffering.

http://www.chicagohumanities.org/Genres/Literature/2010-Jane-Austen-and-the-Body.aspx

"Jane Austen turned herself into a physician whose patient was society." - Dr. Cheryl Kinney

THE BAD:  Death Comes to Pemberley by P.D. James


 

 

Oh lord. I thought to write a regular book review, just like a proper book blogger, but really I haven't the patience. This book was very much anticipated, since to have England's surviving grande dame mystery writer take on Pemberley, sounded an intriguing, possibly amusing prospect. But it's a disappointment, and I think the book will fail to please both Austen-lovers and P.D. James lovers alike. As one of the former category I was shocked to see an egregious error smack dab in the middle of page one. James calls Mr. Collins a nephew of Mr. Bennet, not his cousin. This may seem a very minor detail, but it informs you right up front and center that you are not going to be in the hands of someone who truly inhabits the world of Austen or cares about the details, so you are likely to be ceaselessly irritated; and it also distracts you from reading enjoyment as you sit there gobsmacked that an author as eminent and best-selling as P.D. James does not have a competent editor or copy editor!

Still, I moved past that, as it would be absurd to let one error put the kibosh on an entire book. Although there were other errors (as her continually describing the Hursts as splendidly rich, when clearly they were spongers), the book didn't turn out to be distressfully messy in that respect. Instead, James fell into another grievous and more serious error - she proceeded to recap and summarize Pride and Prejudice for almost the next solid fifty pages. This was done in a stilted, stupefying way that is incredibly tedious to anyone who knows the book, but also does Pride and Prejudice a disservice by making it sound so tortuous and dull that the P.D. James fans who aren't familiar with P & P would hardly be moved to become so!

Once this section is over, the mystery begins, and James starts to write in a more natural style. Unfortunately the mystery she now unfolds is so dim and low-key, the book is anything but an exciting page-turner. Wickham is drunk in the Pemberley woods when his friend Denny is shot. He is tried for murder. There's a turgid, complicated explanation at the end which I won't go into, but I can't imagine a non-Janeite understanding the half of it, or a Janeite believing it. There are flashes of nice descriptive writing in the woodland scenes, with James wielding prose in a masterly way; and her depiction of early 19th century jurisprudence is well researched and well handled. But oh, dear. If a neighbor hadn't given me this, I never would have read it to the end. P.J. James has amused herself with a stab at being a sequelist, but she is unlikely to amuse very many others.

 

 

THE UGLY:  "The Portrait" and Publicity

On December 5, The Guardian headline read, "Jane Austen Biographer Discovers 'Lost Portrait.'" It's a headline that's both sensational and misleading, as is much of the article. The facts are that this "new" portrait has been in a private collection for years, and was auctioned at Bonham's in March, when Dr. Paula Byrne and her husband acquired it. Deirdre Le Faye wrote about the portrait in the 2007 edition of the Jane Austen Society Report, calling it an "imaginary portrait," done perhaps as early as 1818, possibly by the Revd William Jones, who liked to portray authors he admired.

Byrne is quoted as saying, "When my husband bought it he thought it was a reasonable portrait of a nice lady writer, but I instantly had a visceral reaction to it." This seems extremely disingenuous. Byrne was not unaware of the Le Faye article, or that "Jane Austin" (sic) was written on the back of the portrait. Yet the Guardian present the sequence as: "when Byrne...with an Austen biography due out in 2013, was given a portrait of a female author acquired by her husband, Shakespeare scholar Jonathan Bate, at auction, she was immediately struck by the possibility that it could be a lost drawing of Austen." This beggars belief. Her husband thought he was just buying a nice lady writer portrait? Of course they knew that the picture had been bruited about as a possible Jane Austen portrait, real or imaginary. That's why they were at the auction in the first place!

Byrne says, "The idea that it was an imaginary portrait – that seemed to me to be a crazy theory. That genre doesn't exist." Doesn't exist? What was Jane Eyre doing, for instance, but drawing "fancy portraits" of people from imagination? Obviously it was a thing people did do. In fact, Le Faye's 2007 article is illustrated with several other "imaginary" portraits of Austen. But Byrne says, "[Le Faye] "thinks it is an imaginary portrait. I did try so hard to find one single example of an imaginary portrait, but nobody could find one – they just don't exist." And she asks, "Why would someone have wanted to draw her from their imagination, when she was not popular at that time?" Well, maybe after Austen's death, those who lost her wanted to remember her. How about that for a reason?

Myself, I like the portrait; it does strongly resemble pictures of men of the Austen family, with their long noses, though her nephew and first biographer's description specifically says her nose was small. But what she was doing sitting near a cathedral with a cat (she didn't like cats), and wearing a lot of jewelry, simply seems to indicate that it was not drawn from life.

Byrne is also quoted as saying, "The previous portrait is a very sentimentalised Victorian view of 'Aunt Jane,' someone who played spillikins, who just lurked in the shadows with her scribbling." But what does a Victorian portrait (she means the altered and engraved 1870 version of Cassandra's original sketch) have to do with the case? A late, altered portrait is not pertinent. That the one Byrne bought is of a distinguished-looking author, "very confident in her own skin, very happy to be presented as a professional woman writer and a novelist, which does fly in the face of the cutesy, heritage spinster view," may fit in with Byrne's own (ironically imaginary!) vision of what Austen looked like, but has absolutely no bearing on the question of whether the portrait was taken from life.

Upon buying the portrait, Byrne approached the BBC and they started filming a documentary about it that will be aired later this month. The unavoidable conclusion is that Byrne and her husband bought the portrait to use as part of a campaign to build herself up as the author of *the* new major biography, in a bid for major league fame. The documentary is publicity to showcase "their" discovery. But it's not their discovery. It's their calculated purchase. To me this resembles the "arsenic" story in which a mystery writer recently hypothesized, as a vehicle for book promotion, that Austen was murdered. It's all about the limelight and nothing but the limelight - for the authors. Jane Austen doesn't need it; they do. Funny how both of these stories turned up almost at the same time; it's the way things are done in book promotion now. Find some manuscript or picture, hook your book to it, the truth doesn't matter, all that matters is what you make the public think. The public, not thinking about it very hard, now thinks that Jane Austen may have been murdered with arsenic, and that a brilliant scholar uncovered a new portrait of Jane Austen. Let's buy their books! And they may be good books, too; I'm told the mystery is excellent. This means more sales of good books, so where's the problem? Truth, inconvenient truth, is the problem. Mind you, I have nothing at all against book promotion, in fact I support it enthusiastically. And I have nothing against discoveries. But when people deliberately say they discovered things they didn't, in service of promoting a book, yes, it bothers me. The portrait itself is very interesting. It makes the subject look rather like an early 19th century Virginia Woolf.

"Ambition! Ambition! Cromwell, fling away ambition. By that sin fell the angels."

Quarterly Report: Thrift Shop Finds

Seems to me as if I haven't submitted a summary of my Salvation Army Boutique finds lately, liberally admixed with cats, and with few words (unless a Jane Austen quote or two should occur to me).  So let's get down to brass tacks. 

First up:  the mock Tiffany cat night light, here examined by Marsh-wiggle

Pindar takes a look

A Scottish water-colour, showing the village of Pittenweem.  The little green vase (Royal Winton Grimwades) is new too.  The picture makes me think of the song:

Oh, Pittenweem, Pittenweem,

She's every fisher laddie's dream.

She guts the herrin' doon by the quay,

And saves her kisses just for me.

I have them in my study on the Chinese chest I found last summer at the Salvation Army.

Now I must confess to you a slightly embarrassing problem.  Because the Salvation Army Boutique is so rich in treasures, new ones coming in every day, and I've been haunting the place for over a year now, my crystalline antiquities have...accumulated.  In fact, my dining table was becoming so cluttered that Paul started intoning warningly that he would get Dr. Zazio (the psychologist on the reality show Hoarders) after me!  Here's an unsparing view of my table.  But aren't the blue Bohemian decanter and glasses delicious?  How could I ever resist them? 

Note Catullus sitting amongst the bibelots. The cats often walk delicately around, over, and through the objects, and never break a one!  That's not to say things haven't been broken (there was the time Marshy and Tully took a belly flop onto five Venetian glass goblets of Paul's and did a Full Strike...and Tully has deliberately thrown my watch in the trash and buried my glasses in the litterbox), but not one thing has ever been smashed on my table. Yet. 

"To the Great House accordingly they went, to sit the full half hour in the old-fashioned square parlour, with a small carpet and shining floor, to which the present daughters of the house were gradually giving the proper air of confusion by a grand piano forte and a harp, flower-stands and little tables placed in every direction. Oh! could the originals of the portraits against the wainscot, could the gentlemen in brown velvet and the ladies in blue satin have seen what was going on, have been conscious of such an overthrow of all order and neatness! The portraits themselves seemed to be staring in astonishment." - Jane Austen, Persuasion

Just as the old rabbi painting, which used to belong to Peter's grandmother, gazes down at my treasure table!

Speaking of which...well, actually, I've only shown you half the table. Here's the other half. The red (or Quadling) half. Aren't the red decanter and glasses pretty, too? The whole set was only $15!  My other favorite new treasure on the Red half is this wonderful red lamp, Victoria china from Czechoslovakia.



About the clutter problem:  We addressed it by acquiring three pieces of furniture and filling them up with the excess bibelots. 

"Mrs. Grant, having by this time run through the usual resources of ladies residing in the country without a family of children—having more than filled her favourite sitting–room with pretty furniture, and made a choice collection of plants and poultry—was very much in want of some variety at home" - Jane Austen, Mansfield Park

Here is the first piece, an antique wooden desk:

It holds many things (she said darkly), but even more of anti-clutter breakthrough was this mahogany glass-fronted chest:



It made a huge difference to the Hoard on the table!  Why, you can even see the table's surface now: 

An improvement, do admit!

You can see my little animal collection more clearly (if you should care to). The Japanese Zebra perhaps my favorite, but I love the little white running weasel from Carcassonne too.  But perhaps my favorite piece of furniture ever acquired at the Salvation Army is this amazing antique Chinese hand painted red chest.  It cost $75 and I've seen similar pieces online for ten times as much.  (It holds a lot, too.)



Here it is from the side:

"How fearfully will you examine the furniture of your apartment! And what will you discern? Not tables, toilettes, wardrobes, or drawers, but on one side perhaps the remains of a broken lute, on the other a ponderous chest which no efforts can open..."  - Henry Tilney in Northanger Abbey.

Now, here are some more pretty things, and cats, from around the house.



Tully and Marshy try to look fierce.  The blue Chinese cushion is Salvation Army ($2)



A pretty dish from Italy.

Red and blue Czech crystal earrings ($4)

"Having now said enough to make his poverty clear, and to do away the necessity of buying a pair of ear-rings for each of his sisters" - John Dashwood in Sense and Sensibility

The lady shows what she thinks about being asked to wear a Halloween hat.

"I am to be Count Cassel, and am to come in first with a blue dress and a pink satin cloak, and afterwards am to have another fine fancy suit, by way of a shooting–dress. I do not know how I shall like it.” - Mr. Rushworth in Mansfield Park

A black Chinese shawl

"Fanny, William must not forget my shawl if he goes to the East Indies; and I shall give him a commission for anything else that is worth having. I wish he may go to the East Indies, that I may have my shawl. I think I will have two shawls, Fanny.” - Lady Bertram in Mansfield Park

Three pretty dishes (I love blue and white). Left, Derby Lily; right, Tettau from Bavaria; and French "Amitie" from Quimperle.

The English Wedgewood egg cups ($5) are new

"Serle understands boiling an egg better than any body. I would not recommend an egg boiled by any body else -- but you need not be afraid -- they are very small, you see -- one of our small eggs will not hurt you." - Mr. Woodhouse, Mansfield Park



My little vintage pins - enamel animals, sparkly cats

"You see what a collection I have,” said she; “more by half than I ever use or think of. I do not offer them as new. I offer nothing but an old necklace." - Mary Crawford in Mansfield Park

  

A jewel of a cat